Comments on: JARs in JARs http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2008/07/27/jars-in-jars/ Technology and Geek Stuff by Eric Burke Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:37:00 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Eugene Kaganovich http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2008/07/27/jars-in-jars/comment-page-1/#comment-18346 Eugene Kaganovich Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:52:07 +0000 http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=518#comment-18346 I've had good experience with One-Jar: http://one-jar.sourceforge.net/ and especially with its nice integration with FatJar http://fjep.sourceforge.net/ I’ve had good experience with One-Jar: http://one-jar.sourceforge.net/
and especially with its nice integration with FatJar http://fjep.sourceforge.net/

]]> By: Dan Lewis http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2008/07/27/jars-in-jars/comment-page-1/#comment-18311 Dan Lewis Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:44:11 +0000 http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=518#comment-18311 added my 3 votes added my 3 votes

]]> By: Alex Miller http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2008/07/27/jars-in-jars/comment-page-1/#comment-18300 Alex Miller Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:43:09 +0000 http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=518#comment-18300 JSR 277 defines a new Java modularity archive (a JAM) and if I recall, it includes support for jars in a JAM. I've run into problems with re-jarring in the past with signed or sealed jars. One useful thing I have used is the Ant jar task support, which includes the ability to pretty easily merge jars. I think it does it more efficiently than than just exploding and re-jarring by updating directly into the target. JSR 277 defines a new Java modularity archive (a JAM) and if I recall, it includes support for jars in a JAM.

I’ve run into problems with re-jarring in the past with signed or sealed jars. One useful thing I have used is the Ant jar task support, which includes the ability to pretty easily merge jars. I think it does it more efficiently than than just exploding and re-jarring by updating directly into the target.

]]> By: Josef http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2008/07/27/jars-in-jars/comment-page-1/#comment-18293 Josef Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:23:09 +0000 http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=518#comment-18293 I'm sure this feature will be supported. WARs and EARs already do. OSGi has supported this for years now, and Sun is revisiting this in their own "duplicate" efforts. I’m sure this feature will be supported. WARs and EARs already do. OSGi has supported this for years now, and Sun is revisiting this in their own “duplicate” efforts.

]]> By: Tristan Juricek http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/2008/07/27/jars-in-jars/comment-page-1/#comment-18292 Tristan Juricek Sun, 27 Jul 2008 18:39:48 +0000 http://stuffthathappens.com/blog/?p=518#comment-18292 I think I'm vote #148. For a bug to be open this long, there must be something "funny" about repackaging Jars; are there any services/things that depend upon having signed dependencies? I think I’m vote #148.

For a bug to be open this long, there must be something “funny” about repackaging Jars; are there any services/things that depend upon having signed dependencies?

]]>